Divergence on Abu Ishaq al-Subaie, and Israel bin Younis ibn Abi Isaac In the hadith of Ali raised in what is said when anguish

Abstract

1-The research showed that he disagreed with Abu Ishaq al-Subaie in the narration of this hadith, from three faces:

The first face:It is narrated from "amr ibn Murrah from Abd Allaah ibn Salemah from Ali"

The second face:It is narrated from "amr ibn Murrah from Abd ElRahman ibn Abi Laila from Ali, This is what the companion said.

The third face:it is narrated from Al Harith from Ali.

2- found from looking at the faces of the difference on Abu Ishaq that the first face is the most correct  face.

3- found that the Taking the difference on the narrators from Abu Ishaq al-Subaie.

4-  the research explained that he disagreed on Israel bin Younis ibn Abi Ishaq al-Subaie from two faces:

The first face: from Israel bin Youni, from Abu Ishaq, from Abdul Rahman bin Abi Laila, from Ali,This is what the Prophet said,did not mention Amr ibn Murrah.

The second face: from Israel bin Younis, from Abu Ishaq,from Amr ibn Murrah, from Abdul Rahman bin Abi Laila, from Ali, This is what the companion said.

5- looking at the two faces of the difference on Israel bin Younis ibn Abi Ishaq al-Subaie shows that the first face is appropriate, and the second face is abnormal.